Praanggapan dan Entailmen dalam Pemrosesan Bahasa Dialog Al-Qur’an: Tinjauan Pragmatik dan Psikolinguistik

  • Irsyad Shabri Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Hukum Ilmu sosial dan Humaniora, Universitas Dharma Andalas
  • Rahmadianti Aulia Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Rahma Yanti Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Hukum Ilmu sosial dan Humaniora, Universitas Dharma Andalas
  • Yalmiadi . Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Hukum Ilmu sosial dan Humaniora, Universitas Dharma Andalas

Abstract

The study of presupposition and entailment in Quranic dialogue has significant academic relevance, as both aspects contribute to the construction of implicit meaning, cognitive structures, and pragmatic comprehension of religious texts. The dialogue between Prophet Moses and Khidr in Surah Al-Kahf (verses 6682) represents a complex linguistic interaction enriched with theological, ethical, and educational dimensions, thus requiring in-depth analysis from pragmatic and psycholinguistic perspectives. This study aims to describe the forms, functions, and roles of presupposition and entailment in language processing within the MosesKhidr dialogue and to reveal their cognitive and educational implications. This research adopts a qualitative descriptive approach. The data consist of utterances in the dialogue between Moses and Khidr, collected through non-participant observation and systematic note-taking. The primary data source is the Quran, while secondary sources include classical Quranic exegesis, hadith, and relevant works on pragmatics and psycholinguistics. Data analysis is conducted using the pragmatic identity method with the Determinant Element Sorting Technique (Pilah Unsur Penentu) through stages of identification, classification, interpretation, and synthesis. The findings indicate that presupposition and entailment function as integrated linguistic-cognitive mechanisms in constructing multidimensional meaning. Presupposition reflects implicit assumptions concerning divine authority, obedience, and human limitation, whereas entailment represents the logical consequences of utterances and actions. From a psycholinguistic perspective, these mechanisms activate inferential processing, semantic integration, and emotional regulation. The study concludes that the MosesKhidr dialogue is educationally transformative, emphasizing the values of patience, humility, and epistemic awareness in learning and interpreting sacred texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Maraghi, A. M. (1992). Tafsir al-Maraghi (Vols. 130). Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Qurtubi, A. (2006). Al-Jami li Ahkam al-Quran (Vols. 120). Dar al-Kutub al-Misriyah.

Al-Tabari, M. J. (2000). Jami al-Bayan an Tawil Ay al-Quran (Vols. 124). Dar al-Fikr.

Gerrig, R. J., & Goldman, S. R. (2010). The psychology of reading. In D. A. Balota & E. J. Marsh (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 320). Oxford University Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing pragmatics (2nd ed.). Arnold.

Ibn Kathir, I. (2015). Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Abridged ed.). Darussalam.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122149.

Kemmerer, D. (2015). Cognitive neuroscience of language. Psychology Press.

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163182.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.

Mahsun. (2005). Metode penelitian bahasa. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. William Morrow.

Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515526.

Shabri, I., Yanti, R., Fhitri, W., & Yulia, N. A. (2024). Unlocking the deeper significance of prophet dialogues between father and son in Al-Quran: A pragmatic implicature analysis. Prologue: Journal on Language and Literature, 10(2), 513525.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Harvard University Press.

Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz & P. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 197213). New York University Press.

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Duta Wacana University Press.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Published
2026-02-19
How to Cite
Shabri, I., Aulia, R., Yanti, R., & ., Y. (2026). Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Sosial Budaya, 5(1), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.47233/jppisb.v5i1.2490